lichess.org
Donate

Casual VS Rated

I think the same that Lightsss . I for example dont play atomic chess for a long time , if I play rated , I would losse many points , so I will play unranted atomic chess when I want play .

@Lightsss

I'm still hurt from this game
es.lichess.org/IUGKq7N8/black
[offtopic]
@azuaga omg that game was so bad :D i was trying to mess around with 1 g3/1..g6 exclusively at that time, but i was probably very tired at the time of this game or something.

i still maintain that Bg4 was bad and nowadays i'd go for 4..Nd7 intending e5.
the rest of the game was also played in full retard fashion, allowing 18 Bxc5 (my idea was to play ..Nc8 ..Nd6 but that's rather unimpressive given how secured e4/c4/b5 are) and then dropping c5 for absolutely nothing.. just to play some more random moves and eventually win with a cheapo.
25 c5 and you probably would have won easily :D 27 h4 was definitely bad as at the very least it just makes g4 better.

interesting how my understanding of these structures has improved since then :p probably i shouldn't be discussing this game here but it's hard for me to refuse to talk about my games
ummm , yes was a bad game , I was a very bad player on this time with 1600 points. Now I am only a bad player .


@1: For improve your chess , is better play always rated

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.