Search "user:jokido"

The 'started following' messages are even less helpful, aren't they?

Looks like a programming error to me indeed... it seems the computer doesn't claim because it only made 49 moves itself. And then, instead of moving, on the next move it claims because it's possible. …

Chesstroll_Ingot this 0+⅛ is what I suggested in the ⅛+0 thread and what made me think of all increment games feeling 'slow' because of the +1 minimum. Although my suggested +0.1 is even less than +0.…

savagechess2k this is a very fair point! I climbed the rankings of some variants by just playing ½+0 and ½+1 kind of stuff. Perhaps variants shouldn't be played at lower time controls in the first pla…

I think I'd also like 3+¼ more than I currently like 3+0 and 3+1. Perhaps +.1 and +.2 could be possible too. Any more pros/cons? Any enthusiasm?

Thanks! I should have mentioned, one problem with this proposal is of course that people are used to flagging in such time controls, and may feel that implementing small increments ruins our flag-ches…

Hi all, how about increments of ½ or ¼ second per move? Considering the current popular conventions of hyperbullet on lichess, +1 second per move seems like a fossil from the dial-up times. Whereas ½+…

Clearly, the mate-in-three would be 7. g3 f6 8. Ne4 Ne7 9. Nd6#

Not trying to derail the topic but why do increments start at +1 sec/move and not at like +½, +¼, or +⅛. So instead of ⅛+0 perhaps 0+⅛ could be a thing.

Yeah right... and Thibault lives in Colombia